JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 21, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Luis Mariano Rocha Comas

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 1098 De 2006 Articulo 98 Inciso 1º Parcial Y Articulo 100 Inciso 3º Parcial. Se Expide El Codigo De La Infancia Y La Adolescencia. Impedimentos Del Procurador Y Viceprocurador General De La Nación Para Emitir Concepto En Relacion Con El Asunto En Referencia. Acepta Los Impedimentos Manifestados
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

5 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. ACEPTAR el impedimento manifestado por el doctor Edgardo Jose Maya Villazon, Procurador General de la Nacion para emitir concepto en el asunto de la referencia.
  2. Segundo. ACEPTAR el impedimento manifestado por el doctor Carlos Arturo Gomez Pavajeau, Viceprocurador General de la Nacion para emitir concepto en el asunto de la referencia.
  3. Tercero. ORDENAR que una vez sea levantada la suspension de terminos en el proceso de la referencia, la Secretaria General de esta corporacion remita el expediente al senor Procurador General de la Nacion, para que en ejercicio de la funcion que le asigna el numeral 33 del articulo 7o del Decreto-Ley 262 de 2000, designe al funcionario que debera rendir el concepto, a quien se correra el traslado por el resto del termino.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.